The nVision International Conference is an opportunity to explore the global factors that are (re-)shaping the consumer landscape.  The biggest story on the world agenda is of course the implications of the global economic slowdown  – but are these growing pains or temporary setbacks?  Our Economics Editor, Richard Nicholls opened the day with good news – there is some room for optimism.  Even at this time of crisis, affluence is rising in most regions – by 2013, the world economy will be 11% larger than in 2007 and the average citizen 4% richer.

Head of Financial Services, Barry Clark then went on to explore consumer interest in new forms of digitalised currency and emerging payment modes, and asking the question – is cash nearly dead?

Other topics in the jam-packed agenda were provenance, protectionism and the power of local; the global leisure parade and the heightened attention being paid not only to the quality and breadth of leisure options but also our ability to more actively broadcast our behaviours to our networks; smart consumption in a digital world; a day in the life of two consumers in 2027; and two hot new trends – Ish! and Concierge Living.

To get a deck of slides of highlights from the day, to discuss any of these topics in more detail or to get information on our next UK conference on 15 November, please contact Karen Canty on 020 3008 6107

Earlier this summer, The Bull and Bear Steakhouse in New York introduced an unusual discount proposition: prices for its cocktails were lowered in line with drops seen on the stock market.

As part of the initiative, cocktail prices dropped by 1 US Dollar for each 1% fall recorded on the stock market (to a daily maximum of $5). To redeem the offer, patrons had to “like” the venue on Facebook or follow it on Twitter.

To promote the scheme, the restaurant featured a large ticker displaying real-time information about the day’s results.

Future Foundation conferences always inspire debate – and our last one, held on May 3^rd, was no exception.  Although our fantastic host, BBC Home Editor Mark Easton, fielded as many questions as possible, ideas  continued to stream in via our Twitter feed and text service.  So the panel have regrouped to answer the additional questions.

Lena Roland via Twitter (@RolandReckons): Are mobile payments and the consumer data behind them really secure, not just today but long term?

Kerry Rheinstein, editorial analyst replies: Lena thanks for the question. You are right; currently, security of mobile payments remains a prominent issue for many people. Our data shows that only around 18% of all consumers think that, “mobile phones are as safe as computers when it comes to securing your personal information.” However, the proportion of people who agree with that statement rises to 31% when looking at 16-34 year olds. This shows the impact that young people’s greater familiarity and trust of smartphones have on perceptions of smartphone security and mobile payments.

Quantifying this point, our research shows that 47% of all consumers and 69% of 16-34 year olds would be interested in using mobile payments if it was safe and easy to do so. Therefore, we suggest that in the long term as familiarity and expanded use of smartphones amongst more people and more activities grow, more people will trust smartphones and not just interest but also use of mobile payments will grow too.

Megan Bannon via Twitter (@anthromeg): How has the recession contributed to Everyday Exceptional? Have people sought out reasons for celebration to get through?

Heather Corker, Editorial Analyst: The recession has had an impact on people wanting to experience happiness/ exceptional things in smaller, more affordable, packages; and perhaps to do so bit more often as an antidote to the financial gloom. It might not be the case that people are consciously or intentionally seeking out reasons for celebration, but rather carrying a “why not?” mentality, living for the day and not waiting to experience some frivolity (in case things get worse…). Our position is that this behaviour has become (or is becoming) a more normalised way of living and extending to more and varied areas.

Truth Central LDN via Twitter (@TruthCentralLDN): Does avoiding bad experiences really mean avoiding new experiences? Surely even with Eat Social they would vet restaurant

Parimal Makwana, Senior Editorial Analyst, says: Our increasing ability to vet our consumption does mean we can more easily avoid bad experiences when we are actively seeking new experiences. But we know from our research that seeking new experiences is something of great importance to consumers… so rather than discouraging us from trying new things we are witnessing the rise of managed discovery – where consumers prefer to carefully manage their path to discovery instead of taking a leap into the unknown. We still want to try new things but prefer to be reassured that our new endeavours will please.

At the same time by living vicariously through others’ reviews, research and ratings our expectations of any new experiences are always pre-set – creating new challenges for brands to both uphold these expectations and to try and create genuine surprise and excitement for consumers.

By text: Does everyday exceptional not habituate people so that exceptional becomes every day?

Jim Murphy, Editorial Director, replies:  This is an interesting reflection on Everyday Exceptional. Maybe the deeper story is that people and markets alike are now programmed to make life special in all kinds of contrived and deliberately framed  ways. What was exceptional in the past can indeed become banalised - but for that very reason we will all try to redefine “exceptional”. Hence the energy in the trend.

Megan Bannon via Twitter (@anthromeg): Will the 2012 localism campaign have any more joy that 1968′s less than successful ‘I’m backing Britain’?

Jim Murphy, Editorial Director, says: This all depends on all the glorious unpredictables of 2012 : the success of the Oly-opening ceremony, the medals tally, the Thames sail-past for the Jubilee not being ruined by rain… We should assume that quite a lot of positive pro-Brit energy will be released but how long will it last? Consumer respect for Made in Britain is not negligible  -  but will it survive economic recovery (when it happens), the onward march of globalisation, the fragmented regional identities of the UK…?  Or turn into something different in the years ahead  -  something not as easily exploitable by business?

Idiology via Twitter (@idiologists): Have consumers given up on personal responsibility for the environment? We now see that govt should act before individuals

Jim Murphy, Editorial Director: Consumer motives towards green agendas have held together pretty well across the economic difficulties of the last 4 years. But it is indeed true that consumers want companies and governments to do the heavy lifting. One related question is : what happens when so many scientific innovations  – in the field of fossil fuel exploitation and use, for instance  – create more eco and more guilt-free consumption?  What happens when transports systems become so green that active pro-green consumer engagement is not required?  This is the world we are entering.

Sue J via Twitter (@spartaksuze): How far will professionalised lifestyles go? Will our iPhones tell us when we should go to bed soon?

Jim Murphy, Editorial Director, comments: Well, this might be a scary way of putting it but the End of Inefficiency trend is very much the way we live, not now but soon….

Megan Bannon ‏via Twitter (@anthromeg): Is Digital Detox tourism the next trend in travel? Might be some opportunity there for those of us who can’t turn off?

Barry Clark, Account Director says: No, I don’t think so.  As Parimal’s presentation on End of Adventure and my presentation on Performative Leisure made clear, digital is a big part of organising and enjoying trips.  However I think we will see some smaller and more independent operators using accidents of geography (such as poor reception areas and infrastructure) to their advantage.  Indeed we have seen hoteliers in France and other countries promoting their premises on such a basis.  Digital detox might be the next niche trend in travel.

Rachael Lake via Twitter (@rachaelLake): If cheese was an antidote to globalisation, how will we rebel against digital maximisation?

Barry Clark, Account Director has a two part response: 1) Is cheese an antidote to globalisation?  Perhaps.  In the example you reference cheese appeals to us because we’re highly involved in it; we’re interested.  Cheese also appeals through localism, heritage, tradition and its multi-sensory nature.  All of these factors are powerful motivators to consumers and cheese is acting here as the antithesis of globalisation.  So if we extend the logic to digital we’ll be looking for something that is the polar opposite of computing and the internet; getting back to nature perhaps, gardening, country breaks, traditional skills, the National Trust…

Answer 2) Maltesers.

Keep the debate alive – add your own comments and ask us questions!

We've talked in a previous blog-post about the "Brand Match" scheme from Sainsbury's, wondering if the current culture of price comparison will soon give way to a situation where companies carry out the hard work on our behalves and then proactively demonstrate the better value that they represent.

In this context, we note with interest the recent advertising activity from EDF Energy for its "Blue +Price Promise". Under the initiative, EDF says it will tell its customers if any of its competitors are offering better tariffs and that it won't charge them if they then wish to change suppliers accordingly. On its website, EDF thus offers a guarantee that “From the moment you complete your move to Blue +Price Promise, we'll let you know if a competitor or EDF Energy launches a product that's more than £1 cheaper per week”.

Should EDF find itself being out-priced, it claims that customers will receive letters or emails within 10 days of it learning about the more competitive option. And to give the process an air of transparency and impartiality, prices are monitored by PricewaterhouseCoopers (so that customers “don’t just have to take our word for it").

With the company also guaranteeing that its current prices will be maintained until 2013, that customers will receive monthly rewards as part of its “Thank yous” scheme and that the electricity it supplies comes from “low-carbon generation”, it seems clear that our Transparency, Demanding Consumers and Maximising Behaviour trends have lost none of their potency in the early 10s.

But this is a development which also speaks very strongly to our emerging End of Inefficiency trend - which suggests that, at least in relatively low-interest sectors, consumers may soon find themselves willing to hand over a degree of control to third-party systems guaranteed to find them the best deals. Does EDF's scheme show, then, how brands might be able to interrupt this trend by championing their own efficiency? And does it give further proof that we're heading towards "Price Comparison 2.0", where the impetus falls on brands rather than consumers? We'd love to hear your thoughts.